Quoth Og Mandino

"How will you know your limits without an occasional failure? Never quit. Your turn will come."

My Authorial Debut

The Thrilling Sequel

Bartelby, the Scrivener

bartleby2You know what astonishes me? That there are so many “must reads” of literature, that I, a robed and hooded graduate of the University of Oregon’s hallowed English Literature program, have not read. I spent last evening rectifying one of these egregious oversights by reading “Bartelby, the Scrivener” by Herman Melville. I’ve never read it because I always thought it was about some guy on a boat etching intricate designs on whale teeth. Of course, the educated reader will immediately recognize my error. “Scrivening” is not the same as “Scrimshaw.” And at this advanced age, I now know the difference. However, when the story first entered my consciousness many, many years ago, I only knew Herman Melville for “Moby Dick,” which pretty much excuses, one will allow, my internal stereotyping of Melville as a writer who could be expected to include scrimshaw in a story somewhere. Anyway, the upshot is that I made assumptions which have stuck with me in my subconscious lo these many years.

So imagine my surprise last night when I picked up a collection of writings about New York, and found “Bartelby, the Scrivener” in there, with the subheading, “A Story of Wall Street.” Wall Street? What on earth? Would there be some salty sea-dog sitting on the corner of Exchange Place, plying his craft on a piece of sea-ivory? But then I filtered the title through my now-mature consciousness, and realized that this would be a story about a *law clerk* and my interest level went up immeasurably. Because for some reason I find law clerks more interesting than scrimshaw artists.

In any event, I can now say I have finally read “Bartelby, the Scrivener” and I found it the most enjoyable novella I’ve read in a long time. The style was exactly the type I like, somewhat florid but wry and suggestive nonetheless, and I liked all the characters, with the exception of Bartelby, who I wanted to slap around. Of course, I’m sure everyone wanted to slap Bartelby around by the end of the story. I’m sure he represented something … the collapse of the American work ethic, Melville’s depressed ennui over the slow sales of “Moby Dick” … I have no idea. But it matters not. The story was incredibly creepy, and I loved it.

  • http://marshallpayne1.livejournal.com/ Marshall Payne

    I read “Bartleby, the Scrivener” back in 2002 when in one of my “let’s bone up on the classics” modes. Like you, it wasn’t what I thought it would be. Loved it. I remember it struck me as a counter-culture story before I thought there was any counter culture. You know, Bartleby’s passive defiance to proofread certain documents and just his odd behavior throughout. He was like a 19th-century hippie or something. Rebellion is nothing new, but there was something a bit modern about the treatment here, I believe. Thanks for reminding me of this great story. I think I’ll read it again soon.

    • http://www.demimonde.com M.K. Hobson

      The interesting thing about the story is I didn’t get *any* feeling of rebellion or counter-culture from it, because Bartelby didn’t seem to be rebelling against anything. He seemed just to be resisting for resistance’s sake. Which was kind of a weird and surreal concept.

      I felt more empathy with the lawyer, honestly. As one who manages projects (and this is especially true with technology integration projects), I know what it feels like to get “I would prefer not to”‘s from vendors–usually more tactfully worded, of course, but stubborn and heel-planted nonetheless. It doesn’t make you feel in solidarity with them, it makes you want to scream bloody murder.

      I just like getting things done. That’s me. ;-)

      • http://criada.livejournal.com/ E

        I think Melville wanted us to see him as a figure of rebelling against the boring life, but like you, I just wanted to scream at him. I HOPE Melville wanted us to scream at him.
        I liked the lawyer, too.

  • http://marshallpayne1.livejournal.com/ Marshall Payne

    I read “Bartleby, the Scrivener” back in 2002 when in one of my “let’s bone up on the classics” modes. Like you, it wasn’t what I thought it would be. Loved it. I remember it struck me as a counter-culture story before I thought there was any counter culture. You know, Bartleby’s passive defiance to proofread certain documents and just his odd behavior throughout. He was like a 19th-century hippie or something. Rebellion is nothing new, but there was something a bit modern about the treatment here, I believe. Thanks for reminding me of this great story. I think I’ll read it again soon.

    • http://www.demimonde.com M.K. Hobson

      The interesting thing about the story is I didn’t get *any* feeling of rebellion or counter-culture from it, because Bartelby didn’t seem to be rebelling against anything. He seemed just to be resisting for resistance’s sake. Which was kind of a weird and surreal concept.

      I felt more empathy with the lawyer, honestly. As one who manages projects (and this is especially true with technology integration projects), I know what it feels like to get “I would prefer not to”‘s from vendors–usually more tactfully worded, of course, but stubborn and heel-planted nonetheless. It doesn’t make you feel in solidarity with them, it makes you want to scream bloody murder.

      I just like getting things done. That’s me. ;-)

      • http://criada.livejournal.com E

        I think Melville wanted us to see him as a figure of rebelling against the boring life, but like you, I just wanted to scream at him. I HOPE Melville wanted us to scream at him.
        I liked the lawyer, too.

  • shsilver

    I’ve read three things by Melville…Moby Dick, Billy Budd, and “Bartleby the Scrivener.” Only one of those is worth the paper it is printed on and that’s “Bartleby.”

    Of course, way back in high school, when it was fresh off the press, I had an English teacher who asked me to do something or answer a question. I quoted Bartleby at him, “I would prefer not to,” and he decided to let me off the hook.

    A few years ago, a truly horrendous film version was made starring Crispin Glover in the title role, his boss played by David Paymer, and other roles played by Glenn Headley, Dick Martin, and Joe Piscopo. Stay far away from it.

    • http://www.demimonde.com M.K. Hobson

      It is perhaps unkind of me to say so, but just saying “Joe Piscopo is in it” is sufficient reason for me to give it a wide, wide berth. ;-)

  • shsilver

    I’ve read three things by Melville…Moby Dick, Billy Budd, and “Bartleby the Scrivener.” Only one of those is worth the paper it is printed on and that’s “Bartleby.”

    Of course, way back in high school, when it was fresh off the press, I had an English teacher who asked me to do something or answer a question. I quoted Bartleby at him, “I would prefer not to,” and he decided to let me off the hook.

    A few years ago, a truly horrendous film version was made starring Crispin Glover in the title role, his boss played by David Paymer, and other roles played by Glenn Headley, Dick Martin, and Joe Piscopo. Stay far away from it.

    • http://www.demimonde.com M.K. Hobson

      It is perhaps unkind of me to say so, but just saying “Joe Piscopo is in it” is sufficient reason for me to give it a wide, wide berth. ;-)

  • http://countesslovelace.livejournal.com/ ada

    Why hadn’t you read Bartleby, the Scrivener before now?

    I just assumed you preferred not to.

    I enjoyed Bartleby and Moby Dick. Billy Budd, on the other hand, felt like watching paint dry.

    • http://www.demimonde.com M.K. Hobson

      For some reason, I’ve always had an urge to read “Typee: A Peep at Polynesian Life,” simply because the title makes it sound like a trip through the Tiki Lounge at Disneyland. I gather that’s not a wholly accurate assumption either. :-P

  • http://countesslovelace.livejournal.com ada

    Why hadn’t you read Bartleby, the Scrivener before now?

    I just assumed you preferred not to.

    I enjoyed Bartleby and Moby Dick. Billy Budd, on the other hand, felt like watching paint dry.

    • http://www.demimonde.com M.K. Hobson

      For some reason, I’ve always had an urge to read “Typee: A Peep at Polynesian Life,” simply because the title makes it sound like a trip through the Tiki Lounge at Disneyland. I gather that’s not a wholly accurate assumption either. :-P

  • http://marshallpayne1.livejournal.com/ Marshall Payne

    It’s been a long time since I read it, so I may rethink what I said on a second reading. But that’s what I remember about it.

    He seemed just to be resisting for resistance’s sake.

    Rebel without a cause? ;-)

    I guess we’re the opposite. And why as a salesperson I always took commissioned sales jobs. So I could be my own boss. Truth told, I’m probably just lazy when it comes to making money and rather play around with things that make me little or no money. *g*

  • http://marshallpayne1.livejournal.com/ Marshall Payne

    It’s been a long time since I read it, so I may rethink what I said on a second reading. But that’s what I remember about it.

    He seemed just to be resisting for resistance’s sake.

    Rebel without a cause? ;-)

    I guess we’re the opposite. And why as a salesperson I always took commissioned sales jobs. So I could be my own boss. Truth told, I’m probably just lazy when it comes to making money and rather play around with things that make me little or no money. *g*

  • Fred

    Huh- I remember reading it, but being convinced that it had been written by Charles Dickens. Good thing I read this!

  • Fred

    Huh- I remember reading it, but being convinced that it had been written by Charles Dickens. Good thing I read this!

  • http://ecmyers.net/ Eugene

    I love that story. I am constantly grateful for my junior high school and high school English classes, which exposed me to work that has stuck with me into adulthood.

  • http://ecmyers.net Eugene

    I love that story. I am constantly grateful for my junior high school and high school English classes, which exposed me to work that has stuck with me into adulthood.

  • Justin

    I love how the narrator’s office is a bit like the land of broken employees. One does good work in the morning, and the other does good work in the afternoon, and between the both of them the employer feels like he has one good employee working for him.

    • http://www.demimonde.com M.K. Hobson

      As I said upthread, I think Ginger Nut is the best thing going in that office! ;-)

  • Justin

    I love how the narrator’s office is a bit like the land of broken employees. One does good work in the morning, and the other does good work in the afternoon, and between the both of them the employer feels like he has one good employee working for him.

    • http://www.demimonde.com M.K. Hobson

      As I said upthread, I think Ginger Nut is the best thing going in that office! ;-)

  • bob

    Bartleby made me think that Melville was Kafka’s grandpappy.
    Lucius swears that Moby Dick is a comedy. He told me it’s the funniest book ever written, excepting maybe the Bible….

    • http://www.demimonde.com M.K. Hobson

      I’ve never read Moby Dick either.

  • bob

    Bartleby made me think that Melville was Kafka’s grandpappy.
    Lucius swears that Moby Dick is a comedy. He told me it’s the funniest book ever written, excepting maybe the Bible….

    • http://www.demimonde.com M.K. Hobson

      I’ve never read Moby Dick either.

  • AHJennings

    (Sherkhan from LJ): Yeah, I love that novella. It’s so eerie. I would almost describe it as “a ghost story in which the ghost fails to appear” if not for the fact that Bartleby seems very much to be a ghost of no one in particular. I think the main crime the film version committed, other than bringing the whole thing into the present day was leaving out the enormously fucking important fact that before working at the law office, B. worked at the city’s dead letter office. I’m not quite sure what that means, symbolically, but every time I look at the story, it strikes me as enormously important, and losing that detail blunts the story’s effect.

    • http://www.demimonde.com M.K. Hobson

      I think you’re right, the fact that Bartelby is purported to have worked in the dead letter office is of key importance to understanding the story. I think it all boils down to communication or lack thereof; a scrivener only copies, he does not communicate original thoughts. A dead letter does not fulfill its intent of communication to the party for which it was intended. I think (playing armchair psychologist here) that Bartelby embodies Melville’s feelings of frustration, that he’s not communicating with his readers in some way. He’s sending messages that no one’s reading. He could send different messages, ones that might be better received or more popular, but “he would prefer not to.”

      Gee, I wish I’d read this when I was still in college, I could have gotten a term paper out of it!! ;-)

  • AHJennings

    (Sherkhan from LJ): Yeah, I love that novella. It’s so eerie. I would almost describe it as “a ghost story in which the ghost fails to appear” if not for the fact that Bartleby seems very much to be a ghost of no one in particular. I think the main crime the film version committed, other than bringing the whole thing into the present day was leaving out the enormously fucking important fact that before working at the law office, B. worked at the city’s dead letter office. I’m not quite sure what that means, symbolically, but every time I look at the story, it strikes me as enormously important, and losing that detail blunts the story’s effect.

    • http://www.demimonde.com M.K. Hobson

      I think you’re right, the fact that Bartelby is purported to have worked in the dead letter office is of key importance to understanding the story. I think it all boils down to communication or lack thereof; a scrivener only copies, he does not communicate original thoughts. A dead letter does not fulfill its intent of communication to the party for which it was intended. I think (playing armchair psychologist here) that Bartelby embodies Melville’s feelings of frustration, that he’s not communicating with his readers in some way. He’s sending messages that no one’s reading. He could send different messages, ones that might be better received or more popular, but “he would prefer not to.”

      Gee, I wish I’d read this when I was still in college, I could have gotten a term paper out of it!! ;-)

  • AHJennings

    Damn, girl. That is quite an analysis.

    • http://www.demimonde.com M.K. Hobson

      That’s the best thing I ever got from my English degree. The ability to shovel up a load of bullshit on demand. ;-P

  • AHJennings

    Damn, girl. That is quite an analysis.

    • http://www.demimonde.com M.K. Hobson

      That’s the best thing I ever got from my English degree. The ability to shovel up a load of bullshit on demand. ;-P